: Sterling Silver 6x4mm Sapphire and Diamond-Accent Bracelet, 7' |
|
|

Rating: - * Not quite what I expected, but still beautiful ... I'm very happy with this bracelet. It's quite well made and very substantial. I agree with many of the reviewers who have noted that the stones are very dark, almost black, so it's not a great match with my other sapphire jewelry. However, since I love black jewelry, it's not a problem for me. In fact, I'd been thinking about purchasing a black diamond bracelet, but this is even better since it has the black diamond look but is sparklier! Rating: - * Dark stones, Invisible diamonds, Tight clasp ... I was very torn about what to do with this bracelet. If I wouldn't know have know it was a sapphire and diamond bracelet, I wouldn't have realized there were diamonds on it, and I wouldn't have knows the stones were sapphires. They sapphires are very dark, black really. This means the quality and value of the stone is lower. I ultimately decided to keep this, because it is a really pretty bracelet, although I don't think I'll wear it with other, higher quality sapphire jewelry because of the dark color. The other reviewers have it summed up perfectly, dark stones, invisible diamonds, very tight clasp. Rating: - * Gorgeous! But..... ... ...the other reviewers were right: the clasp is WAYYYYYYY too stiff! I had great difficulty clasping/unclasping it, but for the value of the bracelet (Under $24) it is too stunning and I didn't want to give up on it. I've spent two whole days so far with any chance I got playing with it trying to "loosen" it up. It does seem to ease up a bit, but my thumbs are seriously sore! I don't think I can put this bracelet on/off with only one hand as I have difficulty with two! The stones are a dark, deep blue, and closely match, save one stone that is slightly lighter...and it happens to be the stone on the clasp itself. From a distant though, they look evenly match and unmarred, but in bright light and scrutinizing it, there are flaws in the stones, not a big deal as the bracelet was so cheap! Dont expect any diamonds...there are two tiny chips on it, can barely be called "diamond accent" but for the price, I'm not complaining. These cons took away two stars (But then again, I'm pretty critical of jewelry.), however, for the value and appearance, it is gorgeous. Go ahead and buy it...if you have a little strength in your thumbs and dont mind a bit of pain....it's worth it enough for me to keep it. Rating: - * Nice for the price ... I agree with the previous review... This a pretty bracelet and seems to be a nice quality. The sapphires are closer to black than blue. (I don't mind, I have a sapphire ring that is about the same color.) The diamonds are so small I'm not sure they are actually there, but the silver links are pretty. The clasp is hard to open, but if you keep opening and closing it the latch loosens. I got 70% off of 79.99 on this bracelet so it was defintely a good deal. Rating: - * Good Quality ... Hey for the price, its worth it. The connector is a little hard to pull, but its a good product. I bought this for my girlfriend and she loves it. Pro: Price Nice Black color Con: Connector is hard |

But don't worry, there's plenty of wizardry and action in Goblet of Fire. When the deadly Triwizard Tournament is hosted by Hogwarts, Harry finds his name mysteriously submitted (and chosen) to compete against wizards from two neighboring academies, as well as another Hogwarts student. The competition scenes are magnificently shot, with much-improved CGI effects (particularly the underwater challenge). And the climactic confrontation with Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes, in a brilliant bit of casting) is the most thrilling yet. Goblet, the first installment to get a PG-13 rating, contains some violence as well as disturbing images for kids and some barely shrouded references at sexual awakening (Harry's bath scene in particular). The 2 1/2-hour film, lean considering it came from a 734-page book, trims out subplots about house-elves (they're not missed) and gives little screen time to the standard crew of the other Potter films, but adds in more of Britain's finest actors to the cast, such as Brendan Gleeson as Mad-Eye Moody and Miranda Richardson as Rita Skeeter. Michael Gambon, in his second round as Professor Dumbledore, still hasn't brought audiences around to his interpretation of the role he took over after Richard Harris died, but it's a small smudge in an otherwise spotless adaptation. --Ellen A. Kim
On the DVD
The highlight of the two-disc set is a half-hour conversation with actors Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint. They discuss their reactions to the film and other topics with British writer Richard Curtis . Then they answer questions from contest-winning fans, such as what are their favorite kids' books (Watson bypasses the obvious answer in favor of Roald Dahl and Philip Pullman) and what scenes are they looking forward to in upcoming films. More routine extras include the "Reflections on the Fourth Film" featurette (14 min.), though it has comments from some of the other young cast members, and "Preparing for the Yule Ball" (9 min.). The 10 minutes of additional scenes are mostly skulking and skullduggery, plus a long musical number from the ball. The remaining material is grouped along the lines of the Triwizard Tournament, with behind-the-scenes looks at each of the competitions (about 22 min. total), two longer featurettes on He Who Must Not Be Named (11 min.) and the workday of the other contestants (Robert Pattinson, Stanislav Ianevski, and Clémence Poésy, 13 min.), and four games, playable with the directional arrows on the remote control, that can be frustrating to figure out. --David Horiuchi

